fender66
Well-known member
My MPG is really good right now. I don't use any gas at all. Then again....I don't have a motor. :LOL2:
Darkside said:Seth, I am willing to bet that if your buddy tones that big E-Tech down a few hundred rpm he can double those numbers. Do you know what your and his your speeds are in the Legend? Are they still .100ga? We have one on my home river with a 225 E-Tech but I'm never going in the same direction to see what speed he's hitting. He also seems to have that thing WOT too
Seth said:The best I managed in my boat was 39.4 going down river. We gps'd the 225 at 54 mph heading down river with three people in it. I'm sure you are right on the fuel economy, but I get impatient and a jet is more fun WOT anyways. My buddy doesn't have to worry about his boat fuel economy any longer since he already traded his boat for another **** truck! He has two diesel trucks now and no boat. He'll be whining about that come springtime I guarantee.
I'm pretty sure the 1852 and 1860 hulls are .100 gauge all around. They are pretty darn heavy I know that.
Scottinva said:Just as a comparison of another type of boat, I was reading Boating magazine and they did a review of a 57' Hatteras offshore boat. At WOT running 47 mph, it burns an amazing 164 gph or .25 mpg. That just absolutely amazed me that people can actually afford to run a boat like this. So we are all getting pretty good gas mileage in our jets in comparison!!
Scott
I have had a few Rangers, a couple with Merc 200's. The first was a 21' with dual 18 gal tanks. With the 200hp black max at wot you could literally see the fuel gauge dropping. I had the 200 EFI on my next 19' Ranger. That was the sweetest running big motor I have had. Ran like a clock since it was brand new.cyberflexx said:When I am in my Ranger with a Merc. 200 HP 3.0 liter 2 stroke ...
Enter your email address to join: